2008 Toyota Condor vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Condor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Condor would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 47 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Condor | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Toyota | Jeep |
Model | Condor | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 3600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 192 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.6 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1712 kg | 1759 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 70 L |