2008 Toyota RunX vs. 1980 Volvo 260
To start off, 2008 Toyota RunX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 260. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 260 would be higher. At 2,383 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 260 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Volvo 260 weights approximately 318 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Because 1980 Volvo 260 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 260. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota RunX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota RunX (147 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Volvo 260. (140 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Volvo 260.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota RunX | 1980 Volvo 260 | |
Make | Toyota | Volvo |
Model | RunX | 260 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2383 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1132 kg | 1450 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2660 mm |