2008 Toyota RunX vs. 2010 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2010 Toyota Matrix is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota RunX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota RunX would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 238 kg more than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota RunX. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota RunX.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota RunX | 2010 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Toyota | Toyota |
Model | RunX | Matrix |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1152 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4394 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |