2008 Toyota Stallion vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Stallion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Stallion would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Toyota Stallion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Toyota Stallion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Stallion. (135 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Stallion. 2010 Holden Epica has automatic transmission and 2008 Toyota Stallion has manual transmission. 2008 Toyota Stallion will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Holden Epica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Toyota Stallion | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Toyota | Holden |
Model | Stallion | Epica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1812 cc | 1991 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 135 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |