2008 Volkswagen Caddy vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Volkswagen Caddy would be higher. At 2,953 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (154 HP @ 3200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (380 Nm @ 180 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy. (160 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volkswagen Caddy | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Mazda |
Model | Caddy | BT-50 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2953 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 180 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 96.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 13.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 3010 mm |