2008 Volkswagen Citi vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 907 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Citi.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Citi. (118 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volkswagen Citi | 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Volkswagen | Jeep |
Model | Citi | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1423 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76.7 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 87 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 857 kg | 1764 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 78 L |