2008 Volkswagen Fox vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Fox is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,422 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Fox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Fox (69 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Fox should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Fox weights approximately 315 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volkswagen Fox (156 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Volkswagen Fox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volkswagen Fox | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Zastava |
Model | Fox | 102 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 1422 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 69 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2160 mm |