2008 Volkswagen Polo vs. 1990 Volvo 460
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Volvo 460. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Volvo 460 would be higher. At 1,720 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 6 kg more than 1990 Volvo 460.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Volvo 460 (175 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1990 Volvo 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volkswagen Polo | 1990 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Volkswagen | Volvo |
Model | Polo | 460 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1720 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.6 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 83.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 172 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 12.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |