2008 Volkswagen Polo vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Juke is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 385 kg more than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (127 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2013 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volkswagen Polo | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Volkswagen | Nissan |
Model | Polo | Juke |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1390 cc | 1600 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75.6 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |