2008 Volvo S40 vs. 1994 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S40 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S40 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Mazda Midge. (156 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Volvo S40 | 1994 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Volvo | Mazda |
| Model | S40 | Midge |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1948 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1255 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
