2008 Volvo V50 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Volvo V50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Volvo V50 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo V50 weights approximately 290 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2012 Citroen C-Zero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Citroen C-Zero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Volvo V50 | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
Make | Volvo | Citroen |
Model | V50 | C-Zero |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Electric |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3395 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1475 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2550 mm |