2008 Volvo XC90 vs. 2013 Nissan Z

To start off, 2013 Nissan Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Nissan Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Z (327 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2008 Volvo XC90. (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Z should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo XC90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 607 kg more than 2013 Nissan Z.

Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Nissan Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo XC90 (400 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Nissan Z. (366 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2008 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Nissan Z. 2008 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 2013 Nissan Z has manual transmission. 2013 Nissan Z will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Volvo XC90 2013 Nissan Z
Make Volvo Nissan
Model XC90 Z
Year Released 2008 2013
Body Type SUV Roadster
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2401 cc 3700 cc
Engine Cylinders 5 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 182 HP 327 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 7000 RPM
Torque 400 Nm 366 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81.1 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 93.2 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.3:1 11:01:00
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1573 kg
Vehicle Length 4800 mm 4246 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1845 mm
Vehicle Height 1750 mm 1326 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 72 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]