2009 Acura MDX vs. 2002 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2009 Acura MDX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJ (301 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Acura MDX. (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura MDX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura MDX weights approximately 52 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJ.
Because 2009 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJ (541 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura MDX. (373 Nm). This means 2002 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura MDX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura MDX | 2002 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Acura | Jaguar |
Model | MDX | XJ |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 4196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 541 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3040 mm |