2009 Acura MDX vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2009 Acura MDX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,663 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura MDX (300 HP) has 230 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura MDX weights approximately 1044 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Acura MDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura MDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura MDX (373 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade. 2009 Acura MDX has automatic transmission and 2002 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2002 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura MDX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: