2009 Acura RDX vs. 1966 BMW 2000
To start off, 2009 Acura RDX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 BMW 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 BMW 2000 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RDX weights approximately 346 kg more than 1966 BMW 2000.
Because 2009 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 BMW 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RDX | 1966 BMW 2000 | |
| Make | Acura | BMW |
| Model | RDX | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |
