2009 Acura RDX vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Acura RDX is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RDX (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RDX weights approximately 628 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Renault 9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RDX | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Acura | Renault |
Model | RDX | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 38 L |