2009 Acura RDX vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Acura RDX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RDX (237 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2009 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RDX (260 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RDX | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
Model | RDX | FTO |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1300 mm |