2009 Acura RDX vs. 2001 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2009 Acura RDX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda AZ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda AZ would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Acura RDX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RDX weights approximately 700 kg more than 2001 Mazda AZ.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Acura RDX has automatic transmission and 2001 Mazda AZ has manual transmission. 2001 Mazda AZ will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura RDX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RDX | 2001 Mazda AZ | |
| Make | Acura | Mazda |
| Model | RDX | AZ |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 657 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2370 mm |
