2009 Acura RDX vs. 2006 BMW M6
To start off, 2009 Acura RDX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW M6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW M6 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 BMW M6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW M6 (507 HP) has 270 more horse power than 2009 Acura RDX. (237 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura RDX.
Because 2009 Acura RDX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 BMW M6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RDX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW M6 (705 Nm) has 445 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RDX. (260 Nm). This means 2006 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RDX.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RDX | 2006 BMW M6 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | RDX | M6 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2297 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 237 HP | 507 HP |
Torque | 260 Nm | 705 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 12.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1370 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 14.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |