2009 Acura RL vs. 1951 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,422 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1951 Cadillac 62. (160 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1951 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1951 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1951 Cadillac 62 (423 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1951 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1951 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RL | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 5422 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 423 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 6.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3210 mm |