2009 Acura RL vs. 1954 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,423 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1954 Cadillac 62. (267 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1954 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Acura RL.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1954 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RL | 1954 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RL | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 5423 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 267 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3290 mm |
