2009 Acura RL vs. 1960 Austin A 40
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 266 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1960 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | RL | A 40 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 26 L |