2009 Acura RL vs. 1963 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,048 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1963 Lincoln Continental. (284 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1963 Lincoln Continental.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lincoln Continental. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1963 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Acura | Lincoln |
Model | RL | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 7048 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 284 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3210 mm |