2009 Acura RL vs. 1964 Alpine A
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Alpine A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Alpine A would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (301 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1964 Alpine A. (59 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1964 Alpine A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RL weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1964 Alpine A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1964 Alpine A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1964 Alpine A | |
Make | Acura | Alpine |
Model | RL | A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1106 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 62 L |