2009 Acura RL vs. 1964 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,028 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1964 Cadillac 62. (208 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1964 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RL | 1964 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RL | 62 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 7028 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 79 L |
