2009 Acura RL vs. 1968 AMC AMX
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 AMC AMX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 AMC AMX would be higher. At 6,386 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 AMC AMX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 AMC AMX (315 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Acura RL. (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 AMC AMX should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura RL.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 AMC AMX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 AMC AMX (576 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 AMC AMX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1968 AMC AMX | |
Make | Acura | AMC |
Model | RL | AMX |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 6386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 315 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 576 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2470 mm |