2009 Acura RL vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RL weights approximately 607 kg more than 1971 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Acura | Triumph |
Model | RL | 2000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |