2009 Acura RL vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Mazda RX-2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | RL | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2480 mm |