2009 Acura RL vs. 1983 BMW 316
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 BMW 316. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 BMW 316 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1983 BMW 316. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1983 BMW 316.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1983 BMW 316. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 BMW 316. (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 BMW 316.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1983 BMW 316 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | RL | 316 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1765 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 88 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 55 L |