2009 Acura RL vs. 1989 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RL weights approximately 452 kg more than 1989 Mercury Sable.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 1989 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Acura | Mercury |
Model | RL | Sable |
Year Released | 2009 | 1989 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2700 mm |