2009 Acura RL vs. 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (140 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30. (260 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RL | 1997 BMW Mini ACV 30 | |
| Make | Acura | BMW |
| Model | RL | Mini ACV 30 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 300 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 367 Nm | 260 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2890 mm |
