2009 Acura RL vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (367 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | RL | TL-50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 37 L |