2009 Acura RL vs. 2001 Audi AL2
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RL weights approximately 952 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (271 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RL | 2001 Audi AL2 | |
| Make | Acura | Audi |
| Model | RL | AL2 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2470 mm |
