2009 Acura RL vs. 2001 BMW Z3
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z3 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z3. (167 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z3.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 BMW Z3. (210 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 BMW Z3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2001 BMW Z3 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | RL | Z3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 2171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 210 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 51 L |