2009 Acura RL vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | RL | Econoline |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3510 mm |