2009 Acura RL vs. 2002 Toyota ES 3
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Toyota ES 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Toyota ES 3 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura RL weights approximately 875 kg more than 2002 Toyota ES 3.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Toyota ES 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura RL | 2002 Toyota ES 3 | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | RL | ES 3 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 301 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2320 mm |
