2009 Acura RL vs. 2004 BMW 325
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 BMW 325 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2004 BMW 325. (189 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2004 BMW 325.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 BMW 325. (237 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 BMW 325.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2004 BMW 325 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | RL | 325 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 63 L |