2009 Acura RL vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Armada (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 2009 Acura RL. (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura RL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 536 kg more than 2009 Acura RL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (271 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RL | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 106 L |