2009 Acura RL vs. 2006 Citroen C2
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Citroen C2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Citroen C2 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP) has 233 more horse power than 2006 Citroen C2. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2006 Citroen C2.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Citroen C2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Citroen C2. (150 Nm). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Citroen C2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2006 Citroen C2 | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | RL | C2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1398 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 367 Nm | 150 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 41 L |