2009 Acura RL vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2009 Acura RL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura RL (300 HP) has 142 more horse power than 2006 Rover 75. (158 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 75.
Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2009 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | RL | 75 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 300 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 367 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 65 L |