2009 Acura RL vs. 2010 Ford Expedition

To start off, 2010 Ford Expedition is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Acura RL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Acura RL would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Expedition (310 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2009 Acura RL. (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura RL.

Because 2009 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Expedition. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Expedition (494 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Expedition will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Acura RL 2010 Ford Expedition
Make Acura Ford
Model RL Expedition
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3664 cc 5400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 300 HP 310 HP
Engine RPM 6300 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 367 Nm 494 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 5245 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2002 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1961 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 3023 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.7 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 16.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 73 L 106 L