2009 Acura RL vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Acura RL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Acura RL would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2009 Acura RL. (296 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura RL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 6 kg more than 2009 Acura RL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura RL. (271 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura RL | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RL | CTS |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1858 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1442 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.9 L/100km | 13 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 68 L |