2009 Acura TL vs. 1960 MG Magnett
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG Magnett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG Magnett would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1960 MG Magnett. (63 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1960 MG Magnett.
Because 1960 MG Magnett is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 MG Magnett. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura TL (254 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG Magnett. (115 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG Magnett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TL | 1960 MG Magnett | |
| Make | Acura | MG |
| Model | TL | Magnett |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 254 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2530 mm |
