2009 Acura TL vs. 1960 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura TL (344 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Nissan Cedric. (116 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TL | 1960 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | TL | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 1488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 280 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 344 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2540 mm |
