2009 Acura TL vs. 1962 Austin A 90
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1962 Austin A 90. (120 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Austin A 90.
Because 1962 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Acura TL (254 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Austin A 90. (221 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2009 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Austin A 90. 2009 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1962 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1962 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1962 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | TL | A 90 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 254 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 34 L |