2009 Acura TL vs. 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 3,664 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Acura TL weights approximately 552 kg more than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2009 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TL | 1962 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Acura | Studebaker |
| Model | TL | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3664 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 306 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |
