2009 Acura TL vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice weights approximately 220 kg more than 2009 Acura TL.
Because 2009 Acura TL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | TL | Caprice |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3664 cc | 6999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3030 mm |