2009 Acura TL vs. 1965 Chevrolet Caprice
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Chevrolet Caprice would be higher. At 6,476 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. (275 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1965 Chevrolet Caprice.
Because 1965 Chevrolet Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Chevrolet Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Acura TL | 1965 Chevrolet Caprice | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | TL | Caprice |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 6476 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3030 mm |
