2009 Acura TL vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Acura TL (276 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1965 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1965 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | TL | 2CV |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 19 L |