2009 Acura TL vs. 1965 Pontiac Catalina
To start off, 2009 Acura TL is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Pontiac Catalina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Pontiac Catalina would be higher. At 6,891 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Pontiac Catalina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (376 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2009 Acura TL. (280 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Pontiac Catalina should accelerate faster than 2009 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Pontiac Catalina weights approximately 33 kg more than 2009 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Pontiac Catalina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Pontiac Catalina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Pontiac Catalina (625 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Acura TL. (344 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1965 Pontiac Catalina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Acura TL | 1965 Pontiac Catalina | |
Make | Acura | Pontiac |
Model | TL | Catalina |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3471 cc | 6891 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 280 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 344 Nm | 625 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.2:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1852 kg | 1885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3080 mm |